As anyone with even a passing understanding of the legal system understands, heading to trial will be time consuming, costly, and risky. This threat applies to either side participated in a legal dispute.
Consequently, Argument determination has come to be a powerful and leading way of parties involved in litigation to try to solve their grievances before proceeding to trial.
In a mediation hearing each side presents their situation, frequently in short hand type to a different hearing officer, or arbitrator that will render a determination. Much like a trial there'll be a winner and a loser.
Image Source: Google
If the mediation is "non-binding" then both sides might opt to deny the award and then keep ahead on towards trial. If the mediation is "binding" then the two sides take the conclusion of the arbitrator.
Typically either side will probably meet with the mediator in the mediator's office. Every side, such as both attorneys and their customers, will be located in distinct offices (frequently at a personal injury case in which an insurance carrier is involved on behalf of the insured the insurance adjustor will take part in the personal injury mediation without the defendant present).
The plan then moves between the two parties communicating offers and counteroffers. At the same time, the plan will counsel every facet to the strengths and flaws of the individual case as well as the appropriateness of their offers and counteroffers depending upon the real facts of this situation.